Mon premier blog

The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us by Victor J. Stenger

The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us Victor J. Stenger ebook
Page: 285
Format: pdf
Publisher: Prometheus Books
ISBN: 9781616144449

Jul 17, 2011 - 2] General level response to Stenger's “Fine tuning fallacy” thesis: 1, 2, 3 (HT: Mung.) 3] More .. Aug 9, 2013 - By "fine-tuning" one does not mean "designed" but simply that the fundamental constants and quantities of nature fall into an exquisitely narrow range of values which render our universe life-permitting. Jun 29, 2011 - Outspoken evangelical geneticist Francis Collins revealed that combative atheist Richard Dawkins admitted to him during a conversation that the most troubling argument for nonbelievers to counter is the fine-tuning of the universe. Sep 1, 2013 - The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe is Not Designed for Us, by Victor J. Nov 16, 2008 - But we do know that we designed the hammer, and we don't have any reason to believe that anyone designed us, and that is the central fallacy of all versions of the design argument—they just assume what they want to It is intellectual folly to assume that the universe was “fine-tuned” for the formation of life, just as it would be to assume that the universe was made so that a nicely crafted, shiny hammer can be built for the purpose of nailing a wicker shelf to a wall. Oct 23, 2009 - The fine-tuning argument usually takes the form of claiming that the underlying physical constants of the universe need to be precisely calibrated for beings like us to exist, and even a tiny change one way or another would result in a cosmos completely incompatible with life. Stenger, Prometheus Books, 2011; 227. ID advocates will point to examples like the strength .. An association fallacy is an inductive informal fallacy of the type hasty generalization or red herring which asserts that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another, merely by an irrelevant association https://en.wikipedia.org. DM, 34: >> KF: Have you read, “The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us” by Victor J. If you changed the gravitational constant just a bit, and made a simulation of the entire universe from beginning to end with the new constant, would the tiny effect accumulate and render the universe completely inhabitable? Oct 24, 2012 - 88-97 and more extensively in his book The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us. Jun 1, 2012 - Likewise, a universe not designed for us will not look well suited to us but be almost entirely unsuited to us and we will survive only in a few tiny chance pockets of survivable space in it. May 20, 2014 - He labels atheism a religion based on his own assertion that it has beliefs, dogmas, and tenets that are not meant to be questioned, which he backs up by citing a Newsweek article that calls atheism a belief. Includes “The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: How the Universe is Not Designed for Humanity.” Ritchie. [3] Quoted from: Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism, by David Mills, pg. Let us hope he concedes with me now. Jul 15, 2013 - Similar to the mathematical universe hypothesis is the modal realist hypothesis, famously proposed by philosopher David Lewis (albeit not in the context of fine-tuning arguments, but rather as a curiosity in the field of ontology). The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason, by Victor J. Atheism thus predicts, with near 100% certainly, several bizarre features of the universe (it's vast Victor Stenger summarizes a lot of the reasons why it probably is not in The Fallacy of Fine Tuning.